Este artículo está disponible sólo en inglés.
Over the past decade, financial advisors have increasingly favored ETFs and their characteristics for accessing active strategies. It’s easy to see why.
Compared with mutual funds, ETFs offer distinct advantages, including ease of trading and implementation owing to their exchange-traded nature, as well as the potential for lower all-in costs through reduced trading expenses and, in some cases, lower expense ratios. With that backdrop, it’s no surprise that active managers across equities and fixed income have gravitated toward the ETF wrapper to match these preferences. Within fixed income, we have seen a rapid adoption of active ETFs, which account for more than 40% of the cash flow over the past year and represent nearly 20% of total assets invested in fixed income ETFs.1
Fixed income ETF assets under management July 2015-July 2025
Source: Morningstar data, as of July 31, 2025
Over the past decade, the number of active ETFs available has surpassed the number of index ETFs, with some active strategies attempting to mirror existing mutual funds from asset managers.1 A key theme emerging in recent conversations is advisors adopting these ETF “siblings” of mutual funds that they know and allocate to in their model portfolios. At the same time, our discussions with advisors have revealed a handful of challenges, including unexpected investment outcomes, when assuming the ETF is equivalent to the mutual fund. To take the sibling analogy a step further: These products can range in similarity from near twins to cousins. When assessing these products, we encourage advisors to consider these three due-diligence questions:
While the ETF may seek the same objectives, fit in the same category, and even share a common name, material differences may exist that could easily be missed without proper due diligence. Some of the common differences we see include:
Potential solutions to consider
As ETF adoption accelerates, the temptation to swap a mutual fund for its “equivalent” ETF will only grow. But don’t assume equivalence—verify it. Make sure the ETF is managed by the same team, follows the same philosophy, and is backed by a provider with proven expertise in fixed income ETF management.
At Vanguard, we've been managing fixed income ETFs since 2007 and offer ETF versions of several active mutual fund strategies that are substantially similar in management team, approach, and execution.
If you're considering making a switch or simply want to understand how Vanguard approaches active fixed income ETFs, reach out to your Vanguard representative for more information.
[1] Morningstar data as of July 31, 2025.
Notes:
· Data provided by Morningstar is property of Morningstar and Morningstar’s data providers and it should therefore not be copied or distributed. Morningstar and its data providers are not responsible for any certification or representation with respect to data validity, certainty, or accuracy and are therefore not responsible for any losses derived from the use of such information.